Rob Enderle has done it again.

While Mr. Enderle makes a few (very few) accurate statements about Intel’s direction, he’s gone off and grossly misinterpreted, or downright fabricated, several “facts” about Apple and the Macintosh platform. Additionally, he fails utterly to understand the basis of Mac OS X (uh, which kernel was that, again?) and the significant amount of Apple-originated technology that goes into virtually every Macintosh, both hardware and software. I’m all for intelligent criticism of my choice of computing platform, but there’s a key word in that statement that seems to be lacking on one side of this, um, “debate.”

Reference:

AtAT SMASH!! RAAHRRGHH!! (5/10/04)

Just like with the whole Sony Connect thing, we’d rather hoped to avoid incorporating the latest dustup involving analyst Rob Enderle into our plotline, in part because we’re a little uncomfortable playing the role of “third wheel.”…

The Rebuttals: Bryan Chaffin vs. Rob Enderle, Round 2

[…] In other words, I get the opportunity to deconstruct Mr. Enderle’s amazingly inaccurate arguments to his face, instead of having to wait and do it from the confines of a column. For his part, Mr. Enderle tries to counter my arguments with more inaccuracies that I believe will have to go unanswered at MacNewsWorld.